There are, and probably always have been, few consistent moral relativists. How do atheists account for objective morality? What would morality look like if people followed these moral rules? This session will discuss how to present arguments for moral realism (i.e., the idea that some moral rules are objective) and how to respond to the arguments of those thinkers who affirm moral realism but deny that our consciences and moral beliefs are evidence for a supreme law-maker. It will also explore how we can develop arguments to show that the best explanation for objective morality is the existence of God who wants to see human beings and the rest of creation flourish.
